From Diet Blog Share: I just watched Gary Taubes’ Good Calories, Bad Calories lecture in Berkeley, and he seems so convinced and convincing about what he believes. So, is there a flaw in his argument? And if “yes” what is it? I’ve been on Weight Watchers in the past, and I know it works. But they preach the complete opposite of what Taubes

quotes as scientifically proven . So, how is it that you can lose weight while eating less fat, and as much pasta as you like, but on the other hand you can eat as much fat as you like, but no pasta – and this also works? I’m just confused…

Originally posted here: 
[SharePost] Is Gary Taubes Onto Something?